Saturday, March 7, 2009

Desperate times call for ...


From the San Francisco 49ers (a one-time glamour franchise) to the Philadelphia Eagles (a consistent contender) to the Dallas Cowboys (the glamour franchise) to … the Buffalo Bills?

Terrell Owens, the noxious wide receiver, and Drew Rosenhaus, the noxious agent, can spin this all they want, but if the Bills were Owens’ first choice, his choices were not exactly, well … primo.

The Bills — rather like the Cowboys — fell apart the tail end of 2008, losing eight of their last 10 games and finishing 7-9.

In Tim Graham’s ESPN blog, Scouts Inc. analyst Matt Williamson puts it succinctly and correctly: “It’s a desperate team and a desperate player.”

As for T.O.'s news conference smiles, let's just say I've seen more sincere "glad to be here' grins. At 35, with diminished skills and undiminished baggage, T.O. is glad to be anywhere.

Big-house blogging



Recommended reading: Bill Livingston’s piece in the Cleveland Plain Dealer on the prison blogging of former Ohio State star running back Maurice Clarett.

Writes Livingston:

“News that Clarett, the running back who was the best player on the 2002 national champions, is dictating blogs from jail in Toledo to family members brings with it the caveat that he was always good at conning people.”

In other words, while saying the right things from stir is good, talk remains cheap. Let’s see what Clarett — who threw away several chances before getting sent up the river for armed-robbery — does when it gets outside the walls.

According to Livingston, Clarett “had a pervasive streak of nihilism in him.” Is that something prison is likely to change?

http://www.cleveland.com/sports/plaindealer/bill_livingston/index.ssf?/base/sports/1236418458306130.xml&coll=2

Thanks for nothing, Dad


A New York Times blog by Thayer Evans quoted Texas Tech basketball coach Pat Knight on differences in recruiting philosophy he has with his father, Bobby, the former Red Raiders and Indiana Hoosiers coach.

Knight the Younger compared the differences to contrasting opinions men have about women.

“Everybody has a different taste who they’re attracted to,” Knight said. “It has to be the same way for players. There’s not like one attribute that I like more than my dad likes, but it is going to be different because I’m a different person. If two girls were walking down the street, my dad would probably pick a different one than I would.”

And if I were a college athletic director on the prowl for a new coach and saw two of them walking down the street — one of them being Pat Knight — I’d probably pick one who didn’t get his current job simply by riding his famous father’s coattails.

Every father wants to help his son, but by making sure Pat would succeed him as Tech head coach, Bobby made life harder — not easier — for his son. And that still would be true even if Tech's conference record today wasn't 3-13.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Hey, Donny: Get a mirror

Now, it’s sometimes said Manny Ramirez lives in his own world (more on him below). Well, another L.A. sporting figure — Donald Sterling — must live in his own universe. And it ain’t a pretty place.

According to a blog item by Cleveland Plain Dealer reporter Brandon Wright, after a recent game the Clippers owner went after his team in a “profanity-laced tirade” inside the club locker room, threatening to trade the entire roster.

As if another NBA team would want anyone on that roster.

Earth to wherever Sterling’s psyche and ego actually reside: You’re the guy who put this team together. Or at the very least, you’re the guy who hired the guys who put this team together.

In a particularly classy touch, Sterling allegedly ripped players by name, calling Al Thornton the most selfish basketball player he had ever seen, then telling coach Mike Dunleavy to “shut up” when Thornton asked the coach how he was playing.

Sterling has owned the Clips for 28 years, and for nearly that entire time, they’ve been the joke of the league. The only common denominator those 28 years is who? That's right: Donald T. Sterling.

Say it ain't so, Jerry — say it ain't so …

In 2006, when Jerry Jones brought wide receiver Terrell Owens to Dallas, no one was happier than me.

I once again had reason to root against the Cowboys, an often entertaining pastime. And T.O., with his narcissistic whining, made rooting against “America’s Team” ever so worthwhile. Last year’s signing of the thuggish Pacman Jones was like adding whipped cream and cherries to an already mouthwatering sundae.

Last season’s implosion — with Pacman’s suspension and Owens’ verbal undermining of certain Cowboys teammates — was especially delicious.

But early in this off-season, Jerry Jones cut Pacman. And now he’s released Owens.

I feel bereft. Who am I to root against now? Tony Romo — who stops and changes tires for strangers? I think not. And if the Cowboys owner is wising up about the importance of character and chemistry and essentially admitting his mistakes, what joy can I even get rooting against him?

Life is so unfair.

On the schadenfreude front


Thank God I still have the Dodgers and Manny Ramirez to root against.

At least I can enjoy the discomfiture of Manny and his agent, Scott Boras, who engineered Ramirez’s grisly departure from Boston — a departure that trashed the outfielder’s already-questionable reputation and resulted in precious little extra green for the me-first slugger.

Boras reportedly was seeking A-Rod money for Manny — that’s $27.5 mil a year for five or six years. Instead, after four months of posturing — what Boras does best — Manny signed with L.A. for $45 million for two years, much of the money deferred. By playing out his contract in Boston, he would have earned $40 million over two years.

After paying Boras’ commission, and considering the deferred money, there’s not much to choose between the old Red Sox deal and the new Dodgers deal. All that angst and ugliness for nothing.

Despite Ramirez’s checkered history, in La-La Land Manny is being hailed as a savior.

Wait till his first pout.

Friday column: Despite advice, I forge ahead


“Literary fraud is a terrible thing,” agreed Clifford Irving, sitting on my sofa, sipping a caipirinha through a mauve opaline straw. “That’s why when one contemplates it, one must think big. This is so … small.”

My longtime pal Cliff — that him above in younger days — and I were talking about Matt McCarthy’s Odd Man Out, a book about his one season as a minor-league pitcher in Provo, Utah. It’s a memoir.

Make that “memoir.”

The New York Times says McCarthy “writes about playing with racist, steroids-taking teammates, pitching for a profane, unbalanced manager and observing obscene behavior and speech that in some ways reinforce the popular image of wild professional ballplayers.”

But, reports The Times, many of the people McCarthy writes about say the incidents never happened. In some instances, McCarthy quotes teammates spouting incorrect facts — about their own lives. Better yet, McCarthy “recalls” events involving players who either hadn’t yet reported to the team or were long gone.

Oh, and he even gets obvious details about games wrong.

“Aren’t box scores available?” Cliff asked, exasperated. “You can’t believe the amount of research I did when I concocted the Howard Hughes ‘autobiography.’ ”

“McCarthy says he took detailed notes,” I said.

“But he wouldn’t show them to The Times reporters,” rejoined James Frey, entering the room carrying a plate of exquisite, Vietnamese squeasel, my favorite since my days traveling the globe with Anthony Bourdain.

“You’re a fine one to talk,” Cliff said to James. “Didn’t you know jail records existed when you wrote A Million Little Pieces?

“Those made-up months in jail were absolutely necessary to the authenticity of my story!” James shrieked, ready to dump the tray on Cliff’s head.

Konrad Kujau, who all of us had thought asleep, stood up suddenly. “Heren, heren,” the forger of The Hitler Diaries said gently, “there is no cause for fighting.”

The old man’s quick action saved Cliff’s pate and, more important, the squeasel.

Konrad continued:“You must admit that James here fought a fine literary retreat when exposed. What was it you told the press? ‘I’ve never denied I’ve altered small details?’ Brilliant, brilliant.”

“You always take his side,” Cliff sniffed.

Konrad ignored Cliff — which he always hates — then continued, “But what did this McCarthy say when pressed by The Times? He said, ‘This was my experience.’

“We can all agree that was weak, very weak.”

And so we did. The squeasel was passed, the caipirinha was drunk, and the state of literary fraud was lamented.

Finally, they turned to me. “And what is this that you’ve written?” Konrad asked. “Let us see.”

After a quick perusal, they sighed — not quite in unison — then Clifford pronounced judgment. “Stick to straight writing, my friend. I’m afraid you haven’t the flair for ‘memoir.’ ”

Contact Jim Gordon at gjames43@msn.com.